An as yet 17 year old boy has been arrested (under the auspices of the Communications Act 2003) for tweeting Team GB athlete, Tom Daly, and telling him his Father (sadly deceased and reputedly a great inspiration to the athlete) would be disappointed in his performance…. something along the lines of:
You let your Dad down.
Granted, he’s also alleged to have threatened Tom and twitterbombed him throughout the evening. Not really polite behaviour and certainly seeming to deserve the Olog related monicker.
As well as the discomfort of arrest, the 17 year old in question (reputedly @rileyy_69 on Twitter) has since had his Twitter account suspended and has been demonised in the news as an “Internet Troll“.
It’s difficult to judge for yourself as the tweets in question have been removed but the reports I have read state that the perpetrator tweeted his comment which was then retweeted by the victim, resulting in a great deal of support for Tom Daly and a number of accusations of idiocy for @rileyy_69.
If you scour twitter you can find references to an illusive threatening video that is alleged to be the real reason our teen-troll was arrested. You can also find reference to a death threat that many articles neglect to mention, here.
The media furore since has branded the teenage tweeter “poisonous” and continued to feed the self-initiated hatestorm to the level that the original perpetrator could be said to be victim to massively multiple doses of his own medicine.
I don’t think anyone would deny that this news article has been overblown to new proportions because of the Olympics themselves and it is very easy for cynics like me to see this as an extension of the “Thou Shallt Not Befoul The Olympics” arm that seems to be slapping anyone and everyone at the moment.
It comes as no surprise to the conspiracy theorist in me that this debacle has sprung to light less than a week after Paul Chambers won his appeal against his own tweet-related arrest in 2010.
The authorities must be over the moon that they have this opportunity to strengthen the use of the Communications Act in a scenario where the culprit is unlikely to gain popular celebrity support.
Whilst looking into Rileygate I came across this write-up that put the issues into context far better than I have here.
So, how does this latest “Twitter Arrest” effect the rest of us?
Many of the Rileygate articles warn us, the general public, that we should be careful what we say online. Whilst that may seem to be sage advice in the light of this teenage arrest, it still smacks of censorship.
Worse still, this is inconsistent censorship, that is half policed by us the public anyway. What is deemed wrong in one context may be overlooked in another and yet the search engines often neglects context when returning their search results.
Look at the abuse piled on @Rileyy_69 since his victim brought his own friends and contacts into the mix… are they to be arrested too?
And all the while, actual trolling continues day after day unpunished; only the other day I had cause to write about the trolling and cyber-bullying that lady gamers suffer online.
So what do you think?
Do we need to be more careful in what we post online or should we take these articles in context and only worry if we’re consistently abusive to people?